Thursday, March 14, 2013

Choosing your health care team – Part 1


Much has been written previously about the importance of choosing your doctor wisely. But honestly, much needs to be written on this topic, because smart, savvy people continue to make bad choices, despite all the advice that’s out there. 

Just like any other profession, there are some bad doctors, a lot of reasonably competent doctors, and some excellent doctors.  All are not created equally.  But most people don’t know how to discern the good from the bad.  They make their choices instead based on factors like: proximity to home or work, ease of finding a parking place nearby the clinic, the interior design of the office or the variety of magazines in the waiting room.    

Identifying excellent doctors isn't an easy task

Your choice of doctor is important in and of itself.  It also is important because it typically dictates the broader health care system and the hospital that you will be using eventually if and when needed.  You might have the best doctor in the world, but if that doctor is allied with a poor-quality hospital that has unsafe and unhygienic conditions, then you are in trouble if you ever need to be hospitalized. 

The consequences are significant.  More than a decade ago, the Institute of Medicine estimated that at least 44,000 people, and perhaps as many as 98,000 people, die in United States hospitals each year as a result of medical errors that could have been prevented.

Hence the title of this posting: choosing your health care team.  It is important to choose the right doctor, of course, and that is the focus of today’s posting.  But the broader health care system in which the doctor works is also crucially important.   Even in today’s era of managed care and preferred providers, most of us have a range of picks at our disposal.

Today, I am listing some basic factors you can look into before you meet your prospective doctor.  In future postings, I will discuss some of the things you can consider when you meet the doctor face-to-face; and factors about the broader health system that can serve as clues to the quality of services you can expect to receive.

So don your sleuthing hat and start researching.

Degrees.  In the United States, two professions are licensed to practice medicine: doctors of osteopathy (DOs), and medical doctors (MDs).  Other doctoral-level professions that can practice independently are naturopathic doctors (NDs), doctors of chiropractic (DCs), and my professional group, psychologists (PhDs).  Physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (ARNPs) are not technically doctors but can serve as primary care providers within larger health care clinics.  Certainly, excellent practitioners can be found within each of these professional groups.  I will nonetheless offer my opinion that MDs are typically the most rigorously trained and best prepared for general health care.  

In addition to the degree, I look at academic reputations of the specific schools and hospitals where the doctor has trained.  This is not a hard and fast indicator, but a clue about the doctor's rigor of training (as well as ability to be accepted into competitive schools or residency programs).  

Board certification. Beyond completing their basic training, doctors must be licensed by the US States in which they work. However, being licensed does not indicate whether a doctor has completed internship and residency, nor whether a doctor is qualified to practice in a specific medical specialty, such as internal medicine, surgery, or dermatology.  One of the best ways to know if your doctor has the qualifications to provide care in a specialty is to find out if he or she is Board Certified by the American Board of Medical Specialties.  I always look for this certification before making an appointment.

Licenses and disciplinary actions. Many US States maintain online databases where you can verify that a health care provider has an active license, and confirm that no official disciplinary actions have been taken against him or her.  An inactive license or a history of disciplinary action is a big red flag.  In some cases, disciplinary actions can be explained by mitigating circumstances but you should do your homework if you see one on a provider’s file.  

Commendations from peers.  In my city, Seattle, a local magazine conducts an annual “top doc” survey of thousands of local doctors.  Each doctor is asked: To whom would you send a loved one for medical care?  The doctors who end up on the final ‘top doc’ list have been selected by their peers as among the very best in their fields.  Most of my doctors have been, or are currently, ‘top docs’.  In locations where such a list does not exist, you can improvise by asking a trusted physician or health care provider in-the-know this same question.

On the other hand, beware of doctor review websites.  You’d think they might be a great source of information.  But in reality, most are unreliable because they are based on only a few reviews, typically from patients who have had either wonderful or awful experiences.  One study showed that only 3% of patients have ever posted an online review of their doctors.  Until these sites are used more widely, they will continue to be inherently untrustworthy.

There is no single factor or information source to lead you to the best possible choice.  But many clues are out there, if you take the time to look for them. 
  

Resources


The website DocFinder contains the licensing background and disciplinary information of physicians and other health care practitioners in addition to physician profile information from US States that have passed physician profile laws.

American Board of Medical Specialties maintains a database of board-certified physicians.

Seattle Magazine’s Top Doctors 2012.